quote[Weisberg said Diehold was so stunned it did not get the contract that it now believes "it's worth the time and money" of going to court to challenge the contract's award, even though the company at this stage has no hard evidence of unfair treatment.
Galvin yesterday called the Diebold suit "frivolous" and unlikely to succeed. "My office made a very reasonable selection after a long, open process of evaluating the voting machines," Galvin said.
"We are entirely confident we will prevail," he said.]
Bwahahaha!!! The poor corporation didn't get a contract. Awe, that's so sad...
Also, I loved the typo where the reporter called them "diehold."
Monday, March 26, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment